ENG 101 EXEMPTION EXAM
The ENG 101 exemption exam is designed to assess students’ proficiency in English to a level deemed appropriate to follow English medium undergraduate instruction without the support of the English Academic Skills I (ENG 101) course content.
The ENG 101 exemption exam consists of four sections, with a total of 100 points. These sections are Listening, Reading, Vocabulary, and Writing.
The Listening section is worth twenty (20) points and consists of two tasks. In Task 1, students listen to a lecture on an academic topic, approximately four minutes in length and played twice. They take notes in the box provided on the exam sheet. In Task 2, students use their notes and write an academically acceptable summary of the lecture in the box provided on the exam sheet. The summary is graded based on the criteria given below (see Table 1 for the grading criteria).
The Reading section is worth twenty (20) points and consists of a single task. Students read the abstracts of three academic research texts, each approximately 200 words, and answer ten multiple-choice questions.
The Vocabulary section is worth twenty (20) points and consists of two tasks. In each task, students read an academic paragraph containing five blanks and select the appropriate option for each blank. In Task 1, students choose the word that best fits the meaning from a range of words, while in Task 2, they choose the correct form of the same word.
The Writing section is worth forty (40) points and consists of a single task. Students are required to write an academic text of approximately 200–250 words in response to a short prompt related to the topic covered in the exam. In their response, they are expected to support their own ideas using information from the Listening and/or Reading sections, incorporating at least one paraphrase and one direct quotation with appropriate in-text citations. The written response is graded based on the criteria given below (see Table 2 for the grading criteria).
|
Grading Criteria for Lecture Summarising |
||
|
|
Content |
Language & Organisation |
|
10 |
All main points are included and explained. There are no personal opinions or detailed information like examples. |
The student paraphrased the main points. Errors are minor and there is a clear organisation of ideas. |
|
7 |
Some of the main points are present. Some details, opinions or examples given. |
The student attempts to paraphrase and link the ideas. Little effort is required for understanding the summary. |
|
3 |
Only one main point is mentioned. Rest is either opinion sentences or unnecessary information. |
Meaning is retrievable with reader effort and the flow is unnatural. /Little attempt at paraphrasing. |
|
0 |
No main points mentioned. Just some examples or opinion sentences. |
The text is incomprehensible with no clear organisation of ideas. / No attempt at paraphrasing. |
|
No Referencing/According to the text: deduct 5 points Incorrect referencing: deduct 2 points |
||
|
|
Content: /10 |
Language: /10 |
|
Total: /20 |
||
Table 1. Listening section, grading criteria
|
Grading Criteria for Writing |
YES (3) |
PARTIALLY (2) |
NO (0) |
|
1. Is there a clear introduction to the paragraph? (i.e. thesis with main ideas) |
3 |
2 |
0 |
|
2. Are each of the main points clearly introduced? |
3 |
2 |
0 |
|
3. Are there adequate details and examples to explain each main point? |
3 |
2 |
0 |
|
4. Is there an idea supported w/ a paraphrase from the sources? |
3 |
2 |
0 |
|
5. Is there an idea supported w/ a quote from the sources? |
3 |
2 |
0 |
|
6. Are the sources properly cited? |
3 |
2 |
0 |
|
7. Is there a conclusion (i.e. paraphrase of thesis) |
3 |
2 |
0 |
|
8. Is there a final comment? |
3 |
2 |
0 |
|
9. Is the organisation logical? (i.e. order of ideas) |
3 |
2 |
0 |
|
10. Are there enough transition words or phrases? |
3 |
2 |
0 |
|
TOTAL (30) |
/30 |
||
|
|
YES (2) |
PARTIALLY (1) |
NO (0) |
|
1. Is there a variety of language structures? |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
2. Is the language accurately used? |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
3. Is the vocabulary appropriate? |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
4. Is the vocabulary accurately used? |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
5. Overall, does the answer engage the reader? |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
TOTAL (10) |
/10 |
||
|
TOTAL: |
/40 |
||
|
Word Count – 200-250 words asked for, points to be deducted for a word count under 200. Wrong Topic – If the student has substantially written on the wrong topic, grade the writing as it is then deduct 50% of the grade earned. Plagiarism – The student produces one or two original sentences. The student has copied text from the course material, internet, a fellow student etc. to such an extent that prevents the reader from reliably assessing proficiency – Grade = 0. |
|||
Table 2. Writing section, grading criteria
ENG 102 EXEMPTION EXAM
The ENG 102 exemption exam is designed to assess students’ proficiency in English to a level deemed appropriate to follow English medium undergraduate instruction without the support of the freshman English programme.
The ENG 102 exemption exam features listening, reading, vocabulary and speaking (presentation) sections.
The listening section is worth twenty (20) points and and consists of one task. Students listen to an approximately ten-minute academic lecture or interview twice and answer ten multiple-choice questions.
The reading section is worth thirty (30) points and consists of two tasks. In Task 1, students read an academic text and answer fifteen multiple-choice questions. In Task 2, students read five different short academic texts and answer five multiple-choice questions.
The Vocabulary section is worth twenty (20) points and consists of two tasks. In each task, students read an academic paragraph containing five blanks and select the appropriate option for each blank. In Task 1, students choose the word that best fits the meaning from a range of words, while in Task 2, they choose the correct form of the same word.
The speaking section is worth thirty (30) points. Students are expected to deliver a three- to four-minute oral presentation on one of the topics they choose among the three options given before. Students are NOT ALLOWED TO USE POWERPOINT in their presentations. They can only have cue cards with keywords on them to help them remember the content of their speech. Complete sentences are NOT allowed on cue cards. Students should carefully prepare their presentation according to the grading criteria (see Table 3) and be ready to deliver it on the exam day. The presentation topics are announced on the School of Foreign Languages website before the exam day.
|
Grading Criteria for Presentation |
||||
|
Introduction |
6 |
No |
Partially |
Yes |
|
Does the introduction include personal details? (Name & Surname, qualification) |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
Does the speaker generate interest in the topic? |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
Is the presentation topic stated & explained? |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
Content |
8 |
No |
Partially |
Yes |
|
Is each point introduced clearly with an appropriate transition? |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
Is each point explained well? |
4 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
|
Is each main point clearly different? (no repetition of ideas) |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
Conclusion |
4 |
No |
Partially |
Yes |
|
Are the topics summarised? |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
Is the presentation concluded with a personal comment? |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
Language Use |
6 |
No |
Partially |
Yes |
|
Is language appropriate and academic? |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
Is correct pronunciation used? |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
Is the student’s language use easy to follow? |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
Body Language |
6 |
No |
Partially |
Yes |
|
Is eye contact maintained? |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
Is tone, volume, pace and pitch appropriate? |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
Is use of body language and gesture appropriate? |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does the student read directly from the cue cards? |
-10 |
0 |
-5 |
-10 |
|
TOTAL |
/ 30 |
|||
Table 3. Speaking section, grading criteria
As Izmir University of Economics transforms into a world-class university, it also raises successful young people with global competence.
More..Izmir University of Economics produces qualified knowledge and competent technologies.
More..Izmir University of Economics sees producing social benefit as its reason for existence.
More..